As the clock started edging closer to 10 am, I got more and more nervous. You only get one shot at this, and I was hoping I hadn't muffed it. What if no one read, or commented? What if everyone read and hated it? What if I'd made a terrible error or missed something obvious?
When you write for a site with a million viewers a month, even if you are one of dozens and contribute only occasionally to obscure parts of the site, there can be a lot riding on your work. Triple that when you are reviving a feature that has become important to a loyal group of readers. When it's time for that first post, you can't help but experience some anxiety. What happens today might determine whether people come back next week. It might determine whether people remember the feature with fondness and give the site credit for its excellence, or whether they consider it a joke or a lost opportunity, or whether it fades quickly back into the morass of the internet.
Today the first post for the last summer of TV Club Classic reappraisals of NewsRadio, my favorite television show of all time and a true cult classic, appeared at 10 am Central time precisely. And to my great relief, for the rest of the day the comments rolled steadily in, both from readers who have been following along since the summer of 2008 when I began writing about it and from those just discovering that somebody out there is talking about NewsRadio.
One of the magical things that can happen in Web 2.0 is the creation of an unintentional community. People gather around something they care about, sometimes in an unlikely place that wasn't exactly built for their obsession, like the comments section of a publication. Norms and mores develop, enforced by the community. Vigorous discussion is encouraged, but questioning of core values may be squelched. The location, shifting forward in time week by week and season by season as the host publication marches on with its mission, becomes like an online meetup, an event that community members look forward to for its own sake. Friendships and antagonisms develop, members gain and lose reputation, personalities manifest themselves in greater detail, and a kind of gratitude for the little miracle of this accidental gathering can hover around it like a halo.
There are times when we can take possession of something -- treasure it, value it, make it ours by virtue of the fact that no one has laid claim to it. I think some of the folks in these scattered TV Club communities feel that way about not only their shows, but the discussion to which they return week in and week out. It's even stronger when the show has been neglected, or has lain fallow for a while, or isn't currently in the mainstream of the cultural conversation, but it can happen on a show as overexposed and obsessively, ubiquitously analyzed as Lost, where Noel's recaps gained a devoted and idiosyncratic cult following of their own.
This last season of NewsRadio is divisive; some feel it's a sad downhill slide, some feel it's underrated. I don't know if folks will keep showing up for the next three months to talk about it. But I'm glad they came back for this first post, if only to say goodbye once again to Phil Hartman. In a way, I know that I don't have to do much for this to happen -- just provide the space and a few conversation starters. I aim to do much more, of course. But the pressure isn't what I made it out to be. The community of commenters isn't responding to me but to each other -- to what they've built, and what meaning it bestows on each of us who claim it.
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Monday, May 30, 2011
Remembering
In my youth -- as I suspect it was for most of my readers -- Memorial Day was a holiday that had drifted from its roots. Yes, it was always more prominent in the South, given that the Decoration Day tradition originated there. And I remember the large (and beautiful) national cemetery in Chattanooga being covered with flags on this weekend. I have dim recollections of a military parade, too.
But in the seventies, the armed services were definitely an ambiguous subject throughout the American culture. Not so for kids coming of age in the first decade of the twenty-first century. Supporting and honoring the troops has become an activity closely associated with civic virtue, promoted by all segments of the media and never questioned in public.
My family doesn't have a strong military background or tradition, unlike many of the students I teach. My father was in the reserves, and my mother's brothers served in World War II; I'm sure my grandfathers and on back had military experiences that I don't remember hearing about. But other than a few souvenirs and stories, soldiering never entered my upbringing. By contrast, it's rare for my students to have a family without a conscious, active, and meaningful association with a branch of the service, base life, and one of the present or recent deployment zones around the world.
Many commenters have noted today that the distinction between Memorial Day and Veterans Day seems to have been lost. It's a natural result of the pro-military attitude of the times. We take every opportunity to praise those currently serving, and any day with patriotic meaning becomes another chance.to place them front and center. We do remember the sacrifice of those serving on Memorial Day, but the sentiment is not sharply distinguished between the living and the dead. Perhaps that distinction no longer serves our culture well in an era with lengthy wars and occupations, when the line between the absent and the present is thin and raw.
Sunday, May 29, 2011
The way it oughta be
On Memorial Day weekend, you should get together with friends. I'm glad we have friends who are generous enough to invite us over.
You should have a special cold beverage to sip while you chat.
Your kids should make a secret clubhouse somewhere in the backyard.
There should be grilled meats and baked beans and fresh herbs.
The sun should shine and the heat should remind you that summer is here.
Kids should run in and out of the house to get lemonade refills and always forget to close the door behind them.
By that standard, we just had a perfect Memorial Day afternoon. Thanks, friends.
You should have a special cold beverage to sip while you chat.
Your kids should make a secret clubhouse somewhere in the backyard.
There should be grilled meats and baked beans and fresh herbs.
The sun should shine and the heat should remind you that summer is here.
Kids should run in and out of the house to get lemonade refills and always forget to close the door behind them.
By that standard, we just had a perfect Memorial Day afternoon. Thanks, friends.
Saturday, May 28, 2011
Turning a profit
The paper raised an interesting question a few days ago about my university. In 2003, under the previous administration, UCA built a retirement community about a block away from campus and a half-mile from my house. At the time we were told that this was a growing trend among universities. Now it has been revealed that the debt incurred to build the 100-bed facility was over $8 million, of which (after a 2006 refinancing), more than $7 million is still outstanding.
Since 2007 the facility has turned a profit -- sometimes small, sometimes large -- but the very idea of a public university operating a business that seeks to turn a profit and competes with private entities doesn't sit well with some in the legislature, who have made inquiries about the propriety of the arrangement.
The article provided details about businesses serving the public affiliated with other universities in the state, from the hotel and restaurant associated with the University of Arkansas's hospitality degree programs, to a retirement home on land leased by the University of Arkansas at Monticello. The relationships between the businesses and the universities vary, with UCA's facility being owned by the school and exempt from taxes, while Fayetteville's restaurant and hotel get tax breaks for their involvement in training students, and the Monticello home is not owned by the university and gets no exemption.
Lawmakers are uneasy about a university using its privileged position as a public trust to gain a competitive advantage against area businesses. UCA has responded that it's "common" for public universities to run golf courses, detail clinics, bookstores, hospitals, and other operations that cater to ordinary consumers.
What's your experience with auxiliary businesses being operated for a profit by public universities? Do you see any problem with such arrangements? Does it matter whether the business serves as a training ground or provides opportunities to students? Does this constitute an unfair advantage over the competition?
Since 2007 the facility has turned a profit -- sometimes small, sometimes large -- but the very idea of a public university operating a business that seeks to turn a profit and competes with private entities doesn't sit well with some in the legislature, who have made inquiries about the propriety of the arrangement.
The article provided details about businesses serving the public affiliated with other universities in the state, from the hotel and restaurant associated with the University of Arkansas's hospitality degree programs, to a retirement home on land leased by the University of Arkansas at Monticello. The relationships between the businesses and the universities vary, with UCA's facility being owned by the school and exempt from taxes, while Fayetteville's restaurant and hotel get tax breaks for their involvement in training students, and the Monticello home is not owned by the university and gets no exemption.
Lawmakers are uneasy about a university using its privileged position as a public trust to gain a competitive advantage against area businesses. UCA has responded that it's "common" for public universities to run golf courses, detail clinics, bookstores, hospitals, and other operations that cater to ordinary consumers.
What's your experience with auxiliary businesses being operated for a profit by public universities? Do you see any problem with such arrangements? Does it matter whether the business serves as a training ground or provides opportunities to students? Does this constitute an unfair advantage over the competition?
Friday, May 27, 2011
Final voyage
Summer at the A.V. Club means TV Club Classic. During the year we focus on covering current shows week to week, but in the summer when new episodes are thinner on the ground, many of us turn to writing about shows from the past, reconsidering them in light of history or sometimes experiencing them for the first time.
I've been writing about NewsRadio since June 2008, taking on two seasons that first summer, then a single season every summer thereafter. It's been one of my all-time favorite shows since the mid-nineties when it started airing, and has attained a cult following since then as one of the most underappreciated comedies the television medium has ever produced. The response to its reconsideration in TV Club Classic has been most gratifying.
And now we're at the final season. That would be bittersweet enough, but it's also a post-tragedy season for the show; in between the last episode of Season 4 and the first of Season 5, Phil Hartman -- a mainstay of the cast, and the man behind one of its most popular characters -- was murdered. Jon Lovitz joined the cast in the wake of this loss. A lot of fans of the show find this final season problematic. They feel like it's not the same without Hartman, that Lovitz didn't fit in, that the show lost its way and should have ended on an earlier high note, that the whole thing is just too sad to contemplate.
So my job of writing about this season is difficult. I haven't seen this season since it aired, and don't have vivid memories of much of it. I hope that I'll be able to argue that the season is better than its reputation, but until I get farther into it, I can't be sure.
It's also an opportunity to approach the show in a different way, though. Over the past few years the critical reputation of the show has grown tremendously, and my job has become a dissection of why it is brilliant. That's a gratifying role, and readers have been very complimentary, by and large, of my performance. But it might be interesting to make an argument whose outcome isn't already a matter of cultural consensus.
I have the best readers in the business -- they really know their stuff. And they may disagree with my assessment of this season, as has sporadically happened with episodes with controversial reputations. I'm looking forward to working through this season with them; maybe we'll both discover something we didn't know before. That would be a great ending to four years and five seasons that have already changed the way I approach watching and writing about television.
I've been writing about NewsRadio since June 2008, taking on two seasons that first summer, then a single season every summer thereafter. It's been one of my all-time favorite shows since the mid-nineties when it started airing, and has attained a cult following since then as one of the most underappreciated comedies the television medium has ever produced. The response to its reconsideration in TV Club Classic has been most gratifying.
And now we're at the final season. That would be bittersweet enough, but it's also a post-tragedy season for the show; in between the last episode of Season 4 and the first of Season 5, Phil Hartman -- a mainstay of the cast, and the man behind one of its most popular characters -- was murdered. Jon Lovitz joined the cast in the wake of this loss. A lot of fans of the show find this final season problematic. They feel like it's not the same without Hartman, that Lovitz didn't fit in, that the show lost its way and should have ended on an earlier high note, that the whole thing is just too sad to contemplate.
So my job of writing about this season is difficult. I haven't seen this season since it aired, and don't have vivid memories of much of it. I hope that I'll be able to argue that the season is better than its reputation, but until I get farther into it, I can't be sure.
It's also an opportunity to approach the show in a different way, though. Over the past few years the critical reputation of the show has grown tremendously, and my job has become a dissection of why it is brilliant. That's a gratifying role, and readers have been very complimentary, by and large, of my performance. But it might be interesting to make an argument whose outcome isn't already a matter of cultural consensus.
I have the best readers in the business -- they really know their stuff. And they may disagree with my assessment of this season, as has sporadically happened with episodes with controversial reputations. I'm looking forward to working through this season with them; maybe we'll both discover something we didn't know before. That would be a great ending to four years and five seasons that have already changed the way I approach watching and writing about television.
Thursday, May 26, 2011
The British are different from us ...
I followed a link from a tweet this morning to the blog Tabloid Watch, and spent the next twenty minutes browsing the posts to my increasing disbelief. My awareness of British tabloid journalism and its cutthroat business model of sensationalism, celebrity gossip, and pandering to xenophobia and nativism has always been vague at best. Reading about how many papers print screaming headlines that are intentionally misleading at best, outright bald-faced lies at worst, though, blew my mind.
The story that brought me to the site was this correction from the Daily Mail, which hilariously claimed that its story "Babies who are born at 23 weeks should be left to die, says NHS chief" was printed "in good faith. When in fact, the National Health Service consultant in question said no such thing.
But the stories that exercised my outrage throughout the day were the repeated claims that the European Union was about to clap liberty-loving Englishmen in shackles. Proposals to merge England and France! Banning plastic bags! Forcing government offices to fly the EU flag! All examples of the tyranny of the the EU and all designed to foment outrage in the readership. Only problem is that none of these things are true, as readers would find if they read far enough down in the stories, past the histrionic quotes from rightwing activist groups and self-appointed watchdogs, and if they can negotiate complexities of meaning beyond "EU diktat" and "EU plot exposed."
I understand that the British press is given more leeway in the civil code to print material that turns out to be false -- that it is much more difficult there to win a lawsuit for libel or slander. But something is very wrong if papers can't be held accountable for intentionally telling lies in a breakneck race to the bottom.
The story that brought me to the site was this correction from the Daily Mail, which hilariously claimed that its story "Babies who are born at 23 weeks should be left to die, says NHS chief" was printed "in good faith. When in fact, the National Health Service consultant in question said no such thing.
But the stories that exercised my outrage throughout the day were the repeated claims that the European Union was about to clap liberty-loving Englishmen in shackles. Proposals to merge England and France! Banning plastic bags! Forcing government offices to fly the EU flag! All examples of the tyranny of the the EU and all designed to foment outrage in the readership. Only problem is that none of these things are true, as readers would find if they read far enough down in the stories, past the histrionic quotes from rightwing activist groups and self-appointed watchdogs, and if they can negotiate complexities of meaning beyond "EU diktat" and "EU plot exposed."
I understand that the British press is given more leeway in the civil code to print material that turns out to be false -- that it is much more difficult there to win a lawsuit for libel or slander. But something is very wrong if papers can't be held accountable for intentionally telling lies in a breakneck race to the bottom.
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
What's beyond severe?
Another day, another outbreak of tornadoes all over the general region where we live. Last night they tracked to our northwest; today the reports pinpointed their development right in our general vicinity. As the high-risk forecast extended over a larger area throughout the morning, I asked Noel to bring the kids to my office after picking them up from school so we could wait out the threat in a safer structure.
He arrived right after the first storm of the day formed just to our southeast and came through in a hurry. Bearing some bags of food (in case we needed to stay past dinnertime, Noel put together a version of our soup-and-wraps supper that could be made in the office kitchen) and everything Noel needed to keep working for the next few hours, the family made its way back upstairs to watch the radar and wait. Moments earlier the first tornado warning of the day had been issued for a storm that was tracking ten or fifteen miles south of us. Turns out we were almost exactly on the line of storm genesis, which was moving east along with the storms it was spawning.
It didn't take long before the whole burgeoning complex was erupting to our east. Soon the map filled with thunderstorm and tornado warning polygons stretching along I-30 and up to the northeast. But we were in the clear. The system had passed us by only moments before producing any severe weather.
We waited an extra 45 minutes just to be sure there wouldn't be any more storms firing in our area, then headed home with our food in tow to make dinner in our own kitchen. From north to south, Missouri to Louisiana, the line of dangerous weather all the forecasts were warning about continues to march east. This time we were lucky enough to be out of the zone where a safe place was necessary. Others not so fortunate are, I hope, in a place where they can preserve life and limb. This extraordinary tornado season should have alerted all of us that even though we can't steer a storm away from our property, we can be prepared to minimize our dangers.
Everyone in this region is ready for tornado time to be over. The destruction has been horrific, unprecedented, dispiriting, and relentless. Let's hope we don't see another year like this for another generation.
He arrived right after the first storm of the day formed just to our southeast and came through in a hurry. Bearing some bags of food (in case we needed to stay past dinnertime, Noel put together a version of our soup-and-wraps supper that could be made in the office kitchen) and everything Noel needed to keep working for the next few hours, the family made its way back upstairs to watch the radar and wait. Moments earlier the first tornado warning of the day had been issued for a storm that was tracking ten or fifteen miles south of us. Turns out we were almost exactly on the line of storm genesis, which was moving east along with the storms it was spawning.
It didn't take long before the whole burgeoning complex was erupting to our east. Soon the map filled with thunderstorm and tornado warning polygons stretching along I-30 and up to the northeast. But we were in the clear. The system had passed us by only moments before producing any severe weather.
We waited an extra 45 minutes just to be sure there wouldn't be any more storms firing in our area, then headed home with our food in tow to make dinner in our own kitchen. From north to south, Missouri to Louisiana, the line of dangerous weather all the forecasts were warning about continues to march east. This time we were lucky enough to be out of the zone where a safe place was necessary. Others not so fortunate are, I hope, in a place where they can preserve life and limb. This extraordinary tornado season should have alerted all of us that even though we can't steer a storm away from our property, we can be prepared to minimize our dangers.
Everyone in this region is ready for tornado time to be over. The destruction has been horrific, unprecedented, dispiriting, and relentless. Let's hope we don't see another year like this for another generation.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Upgrade
I love my MacBook Air. To everyone who asks, I rave that it's my favorite of all the computers I've owned. Sleek, light, ultraportrable, yet a workhorse with a full-sized keyboard and screen and plenty of memory for my cloud-computing tendencies.
The original knock on the Air, back when it was introduced, was the lack of a disc media drive. I bought an external drive with the machine, but I can count on one hand the number of times I've used it in three years. It makes no sense to carry a heavy drive every day when you might need it once a month to install software -- and with downloadable software the new norm, that's a level of use that few people will ever reach.
My original Air is a little more than three years old now. It's served me well. But it's showing signs of age -- increasing slowness, the spinning beach ball, a lot of force-quitting needed. I'm inclined to think it could be rehabilitated, slimmed down, retrofitted for a different purpose, and live another several years. My few tentative steps in that direction have made some difference, but I still have trouble playing video and keeping high-demand applications (like Twitter clients) open.
And Apple has introduced the next generation Air, which features a solid-state hard drive standard. It was an option on the first generation, but I didn't get it. I prefer iPad-style flash memory storage -- no moving parts to wear out.
It may not be the right time to replace my Air in terms of getting a closeout deal of some kind. And I don't have any urgent need for a new machine for any particular projects or functions upcoming. (Well, except for my movie-clip-laden orientation talk to the new freshmen in early June.) But every time I have to shut down and restart to get my applications to run smoothly, or sit through long delays between mouse clicks registering, I start dreaming about a new dream machine -- and feel a little guilty about the love I'm leaving behind.
The original knock on the Air, back when it was introduced, was the lack of a disc media drive. I bought an external drive with the machine, but I can count on one hand the number of times I've used it in three years. It makes no sense to carry a heavy drive every day when you might need it once a month to install software -- and with downloadable software the new norm, that's a level of use that few people will ever reach.
My original Air is a little more than three years old now. It's served me well. But it's showing signs of age -- increasing slowness, the spinning beach ball, a lot of force-quitting needed. I'm inclined to think it could be rehabilitated, slimmed down, retrofitted for a different purpose, and live another several years. My few tentative steps in that direction have made some difference, but I still have trouble playing video and keeping high-demand applications (like Twitter clients) open.
And Apple has introduced the next generation Air, which features a solid-state hard drive standard. It was an option on the first generation, but I didn't get it. I prefer iPad-style flash memory storage -- no moving parts to wear out.
It may not be the right time to replace my Air in terms of getting a closeout deal of some kind. And I don't have any urgent need for a new machine for any particular projects or functions upcoming. (Well, except for my movie-clip-laden orientation talk to the new freshmen in early June.) But every time I have to shut down and restart to get my applications to run smoothly, or sit through long delays between mouse clicks registering, I start dreaming about a new dream machine -- and feel a little guilty about the love I'm leaving behind.
Monday, May 23, 2011
In the crowd
So much ink has been spilled about how the internet affects us. Y'all know how I feel -- I think the opportunities afforded by online connection far outweigh the problems or potential losses involved. One area that is not sufficiently appreciated, in my view, is the creation of crowds.
I think people understand (although may not bring to consciousness often enough) that the internet overcomes isolation and helps people find support groups. Where you live, there might be no one else with your particular problem -- or no one willing to talk about it. Online, you can find hundreds -- or hundreds of thousands. Knowing you are not alone is one of the most powerful steps toward dealing in a healthy way with your challenges, whatever they may be.
But just as important, affecting just many people, is another crowd-creating phenomenon -- that of inspiration and empowerment. I've written before about the experience of going online and finding that the activity you want to learn isn't beyond your abilities, because you can find example after example of people doing it -- people just like you.
That experience lasts well beyond the novice stage, the hurdle of learning and becoming proficient at your chosen activity. It remains startling to me, many years on, just how big that crowd can be. Today is Sew, Mama, Sew's Giveaway Day, a blogosphere-wide holiday for handcrafters. Hundreds of blogs all over the world are participating; the link above is only one of three master lists of giveaways. That may not sound impressive until you realize that almost every one of those sites are focused on providing resources for others to participate in the craft. They host tutorials, provide patterns, and demonstrate the possibilities of the activity. For every site in the list, there are dozens -- hundreds -- sometimes thousands of followers making things of their own.
And lest you forget that, sometimes those followers appear in a crowd, all together, all at once, their work providing vivid proof that the world is full of more people making and creating and forging their own creative, beautiful environments than you usually let yourself imagine. Flickr pools collecting multiple versions of a certain design, or all the things people have made out of a certain material, or variations on a motif theme. Hundreds. Thousands. Just in this little corner of all the things you could make, or all the materials you could use.
The internet has this power to aggregate. And the potential of aggregation is its forceful demonstration of what is possible. I can no longer pretend that everyone thinks this is hard, that everyone has trouble doing it, that it is a lost art. In fact, I'm actively annoyed now when people talk to me about my knitting and imply that no one does this anymore. Open your eyes! I want to say. There are millions of people knitting, there are thousands of people making and selling yarn and designing patterns. How can you miss this? How has it not crossed your consciousness? Are you blind?
I want to say to them: Look, I am here to prove to you that you could do this, if you chose. But you could tell yourself, I suppose, that I'm specially talented -- different from you. If so, please have a look at the hundreds of thousands like me who not only do this but go to the trouble of posting on the internet what they have done. Imagine that for each of them there are a handful or a roomful or a town-full of people doing it who do not bother to post about it on the internet -- the invisible fellow travelers. Now do you see that you have no excuse?
Go and look. Then do. You may become an exception in your workplace, in your neighborhood, in your suburb. But you are not an endangered species in the world. You are part of a massive movement. People fear that the message of the internet is observe, comment, be above it all, be a parasite. I disagree. Open the right door -- the right million doors -- and the message is: Do. As we are doing.
I think people understand (although may not bring to consciousness often enough) that the internet overcomes isolation and helps people find support groups. Where you live, there might be no one else with your particular problem -- or no one willing to talk about it. Online, you can find hundreds -- or hundreds of thousands. Knowing you are not alone is one of the most powerful steps toward dealing in a healthy way with your challenges, whatever they may be.
But just as important, affecting just many people, is another crowd-creating phenomenon -- that of inspiration and empowerment. I've written before about the experience of going online and finding that the activity you want to learn isn't beyond your abilities, because you can find example after example of people doing it -- people just like you.
That experience lasts well beyond the novice stage, the hurdle of learning and becoming proficient at your chosen activity. It remains startling to me, many years on, just how big that crowd can be. Today is Sew, Mama, Sew's Giveaway Day, a blogosphere-wide holiday for handcrafters. Hundreds of blogs all over the world are participating; the link above is only one of three master lists of giveaways. That may not sound impressive until you realize that almost every one of those sites are focused on providing resources for others to participate in the craft. They host tutorials, provide patterns, and demonstrate the possibilities of the activity. For every site in the list, there are dozens -- hundreds -- sometimes thousands of followers making things of their own.
And lest you forget that, sometimes those followers appear in a crowd, all together, all at once, their work providing vivid proof that the world is full of more people making and creating and forging their own creative, beautiful environments than you usually let yourself imagine. Flickr pools collecting multiple versions of a certain design, or all the things people have made out of a certain material, or variations on a motif theme. Hundreds. Thousands. Just in this little corner of all the things you could make, or all the materials you could use.
The internet has this power to aggregate. And the potential of aggregation is its forceful demonstration of what is possible. I can no longer pretend that everyone thinks this is hard, that everyone has trouble doing it, that it is a lost art. In fact, I'm actively annoyed now when people talk to me about my knitting and imply that no one does this anymore. Open your eyes! I want to say. There are millions of people knitting, there are thousands of people making and selling yarn and designing patterns. How can you miss this? How has it not crossed your consciousness? Are you blind?
I want to say to them: Look, I am here to prove to you that you could do this, if you chose. But you could tell yourself, I suppose, that I'm specially talented -- different from you. If so, please have a look at the hundreds of thousands like me who not only do this but go to the trouble of posting on the internet what they have done. Imagine that for each of them there are a handful or a roomful or a town-full of people doing it who do not bother to post about it on the internet -- the invisible fellow travelers. Now do you see that you have no excuse?
Go and look. Then do. You may become an exception in your workplace, in your neighborhood, in your suburb. But you are not an endangered species in the world. You are part of a massive movement. People fear that the message of the internet is observe, comment, be above it all, be a parasite. I disagree. Open the right door -- the right million doors -- and the message is: Do. As we are doing.
Sunday, May 22, 2011
Connecting
I'm going to be in Boston for a conference in the fall of 2012. Looking forward to the visit. But I don't have to wait to connect with some folks in the city. I'm going to do that tomorrow via Skype, thanks to an alert and nimble teacher who asked me to visit his class.
Steven Berbeco teaches history and Arabic at the Charlestown School (his Arabic classes were featured on NPR's Day to Day back in 2006). When he decided to show his kids Walter Salles' film Central Station as part of a unit on Brazil, he went to the web to find some texts to supplement their viewing. He found my 2001 article "Faith and the Absent Savior in Central Station," and thought it was accessible enough to give to his kids -- less as a way to enrich the information about Brazil than as an example of analytic academic writing. In that vein he's asked me to Skype into two classes early Monday morning to chat with the students about how I approached the movie and generated an argument about its meaning.
I have to get up an hour earlier than usual to make the date -- Berbeco's first class meets at 7:30 am Eastern time, and I'm going to join them at 7:00 am my time, thirty minutes later. But it's a happy obligation. I'm impressed with their teacher's initiative and energy, and excited that I can be present in their class across the miles.
Steven Berbeco teaches history and Arabic at the Charlestown School (his Arabic classes were featured on NPR's Day to Day back in 2006). When he decided to show his kids Walter Salles' film Central Station as part of a unit on Brazil, he went to the web to find some texts to supplement their viewing. He found my 2001 article "Faith and the Absent Savior in Central Station," and thought it was accessible enough to give to his kids -- less as a way to enrich the information about Brazil than as an example of analytic academic writing. In that vein he's asked me to Skype into two classes early Monday morning to chat with the students about how I approached the movie and generated an argument about its meaning.
I have to get up an hour earlier than usual to make the date -- Berbeco's first class meets at 7:30 am Eastern time, and I'm going to join them at 7:00 am my time, thirty minutes later. But it's a happy obligation. I'm impressed with their teacher's initiative and energy, and excited that I can be present in their class across the miles.
Saturday, May 21, 2011
Storage
In the summer, when the pace is slower, our thoughts turn to problems long set aside. One of the perennials in our house is storage. We have a lot of certain things -- a lot of DVDs, a lot of CDs, a lot of yarn, a lot of books, a lot of games. And we're always ruminating on the best way to get them all put where they belong, where they won't get in the way but will be available when we need them.
And by "a lot," I don't mean what other people might call a lot. For many of my students, a hundred DVDs is a lot; for most of our friends, 300 or 500 would certainly qualify. We have thousands, with more being added every day. In five short years of knitting, I've accumulated hundreds of skeins of yarn. And despite our best efforts, we are not getting rid of books faster than they are coming in the door.
Several major efforts are underway to reassert our superiority over these things, these media and materials in their multiple units. New wooden bookcases for the kids -- to supplement and/or replace cheap particleboard ones that they've long since outgrown. A new three-drawer Cam-Am media cabinet to give us some growing room on top of the four drawers we've long since outgrown.
And for me --at least in my current scheming, to be realized in a month or so -- an Expedit storage wall, with a desk and maybe some other bits and bobs, to become my new craft and sewing area.
I like having places where things belong, even if you couldn't tell it from the way my stuff usually is. Nothing gives me more satisfaction than a major reorganization project. I'm hoping this summer will be full of them.
Friday, May 20, 2011
Earning it
I've done my share of work this week. I dealt with some complicated situations regarding student scholarship and retention status -- ones that required more thought and careful wordsmithing of communications due to factors like medical conditions and incomplete grades. I wrote and circulated a new set of letters designed to provide official notification of scholarship awards and renewals. I proofread the copy-edited manuscripts of half the chapters in my forthcoming co-edited book (with my co-editor slated to proof the rest). I attended some long meetings, wrote a piece for a former student's webzine, and of course posted a couple of TV writeups. I even helped a colleague with her knitting questions.
But as I was working on one of the final tasks of my to-do list, revising a set of lengthy e-mails containing summer assignments for students enrolled in my handcrafting seminar this fall (they are customized to the various skill levels already present in the class, as determined by a survey I had them all fill out), the college secretary knocked on my door. She said our boss had given her permission to go home early. I checked my watch -- 1:30 pm. My boss had popped in an hour earlier to say he was taking a half-day vacation. When I looked out my office door, I saw that I was the only one left in the office.
It didn't seem right to abandon my revision project in midstream just because the building was emptying (helped along by the gloomy skies and occasional heavy rain outside). So I carried on for another hour. Really, though, I was wondering if I had earned an early start to my weekend. Even though I'd accomplished quite a bit during the week, I'd also enjoyed the summer's much more leisurely pace in its first full week. I took two mornings off-campus to work on research, completing an intensive self-education in qualitative fieldwork methods. And I spent a couple of late afternoons on my running, ducking out a few minutes early to get in a couple of miles before heading home for dinner.
When I finally did leave, fully two hours before official closing time, it was a strangely joyless moment. I actually lingered, packing up my things, rather than racing for the car and freedom. Normally I enjoy the Friday afternoon start to my weekend wholeheartedly, celebrating the sharp distinction between the difficult, time-consuming obligations of my work and the relaxing pursuits of my leisure time. It's one of the lessons that needs reiteration throughout life, lest one imagine that a life comprised solely of avocations would be equally as fulfilling: without contrast, that singular joy is dampened.
But as I was working on one of the final tasks of my to-do list, revising a set of lengthy e-mails containing summer assignments for students enrolled in my handcrafting seminar this fall (they are customized to the various skill levels already present in the class, as determined by a survey I had them all fill out), the college secretary knocked on my door. She said our boss had given her permission to go home early. I checked my watch -- 1:30 pm. My boss had popped in an hour earlier to say he was taking a half-day vacation. When I looked out my office door, I saw that I was the only one left in the office.
It didn't seem right to abandon my revision project in midstream just because the building was emptying (helped along by the gloomy skies and occasional heavy rain outside). So I carried on for another hour. Really, though, I was wondering if I had earned an early start to my weekend. Even though I'd accomplished quite a bit during the week, I'd also enjoyed the summer's much more leisurely pace in its first full week. I took two mornings off-campus to work on research, completing an intensive self-education in qualitative fieldwork methods. And I spent a couple of late afternoons on my running, ducking out a few minutes early to get in a couple of miles before heading home for dinner.
When I finally did leave, fully two hours before official closing time, it was a strangely joyless moment. I actually lingered, packing up my things, rather than racing for the car and freedom. Normally I enjoy the Friday afternoon start to my weekend wholeheartedly, celebrating the sharp distinction between the difficult, time-consuming obligations of my work and the relaxing pursuits of my leisure time. It's one of the lessons that needs reiteration throughout life, lest one imagine that a life comprised solely of avocations would be equally as fulfilling: without contrast, that singular joy is dampened.
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Raptured
I've been shying away from expressing opinions in this blog that might not be shared by some of the folks I know read it -- especially political and religious opinions. As a result, I don't weigh in on many of the issues that are the major topics of discussion in the culture around me, and I certainly don't bring my theological perspective to bear, even when the topic is religiously charged.
It's been a surprise to me to find, while moving the posts in my old blog to a new location, that expressing exactly such opinions used to be my common practice. In fact, I'll go so far as to say that having a place to have my say on these subjects was one of the main reasons I started blogging.
I find myself rejecting many potential writing topics because I know my opinion on them is strong but not necessarily congruent with some segment of my audience. I'd like to modify that practice -- not in order to offend people, but in order to think through some subjects where I might quite naturally be entitled to an opinion.
So in that spirit, it is incumbent on me to mention that the devotees of a powerful fringe radio network have become convinced by their leader that the rapture is going to happen at around 6 pm on May 21, two days from now. Interestingly, Harold Camping (the originator of this prediction) asserts that this 6 pm scheduling isn't Jerusalem time or Greenwich Mean Time, but local time -- that is, believers will be caught up in the air (as Paul first suggested) when the clock strikes 6 in their time zone, and the rapture will ripple around the world hour by hour. That's a new one on me.
Mainstream Christian thinkers and scholars have already given many reasons for doubting Camping's timetable, based on the naive, relatively recent, and checkered pedigree of premillennial dispensationalism. Anybody with some historical knowledge should already be skeptical, since such definitive and dated assurances have been made many times previously and have always failed.
I grew up in a church where the Rapture was a fervent article of faith, and a near-future historical event that we all looked forward to. We saw it in films, heard about it in revivals, sang songs about it around the campfire. But I came to realize, during my university education in religious studies, that the Rapture is not a prophecy of an end-times event that can be pinpointed in the Bible, but instead is a piece of a larger theory created by assembling a complex puzzle from verses scattered all over scripture -- including verses that quite clearly were not intended by their authors or understood by their original audiences to be prophecies of the end times.
So not only am I confident the Rapture isn't happening on May 21, I'm confident the Rapture isn't happening at all, ever. Even if I were a biblical literalist, I wouldn't believe in the Rapture as it's preached and in the system in which it was invented and remains embedded -- as a removal of believers from the earth prior to the rise of the Antichrist and the time of tribulation. Because that's a combination of Paul's statement that the dead in Christ will rise first and believers will meet Christ in the air when Jesus comes again -- that is, as the sequence of events in a single happening called the second coming -- and the Revelation narrative with its seven-year periods and various Satanic figures and awful plagues. There's nothing obvious or literal about combining those two parts of Scripture, written by different people for different reasons in completely different political and religious circumstances at least fifty years apart (notably, one before the destruction of the Jerusalem temple and one after). The fact that many people regard this combination as natural and obvious is a testimony to how thoroughly this century-old system of interpretation has infiltrated parts of the evangelical world.
Wouldn't it be nice if we didn't have to deal with our long-term problems or care about the future of the world's oppressed and poor because the world was going to end? If the countdown to the new heaven and the new earth relieved us of our responsibilities to each other? I know that thoughtful Rapture believers would never advocate such a perspective. But I also know that the end of the world and Judgment Day, if asserted as actual near-future historical events, are bound to relativize the value of all our other mandates and efforts.
So I encourage everyone to pay their bills and leave their 401(k)s alone and get the oil changed in their cars. We'll all still be here May 22, and on the day after the next predicted end of the world, and basically until the world is done with us -- not when God decides to pull the plug.
It's been a surprise to me to find, while moving the posts in my old blog to a new location, that expressing exactly such opinions used to be my common practice. In fact, I'll go so far as to say that having a place to have my say on these subjects was one of the main reasons I started blogging.
I find myself rejecting many potential writing topics because I know my opinion on them is strong but not necessarily congruent with some segment of my audience. I'd like to modify that practice -- not in order to offend people, but in order to think through some subjects where I might quite naturally be entitled to an opinion.
So in that spirit, it is incumbent on me to mention that the devotees of a powerful fringe radio network have become convinced by their leader that the rapture is going to happen at around 6 pm on May 21, two days from now. Interestingly, Harold Camping (the originator of this prediction) asserts that this 6 pm scheduling isn't Jerusalem time or Greenwich Mean Time, but local time -- that is, believers will be caught up in the air (as Paul first suggested) when the clock strikes 6 in their time zone, and the rapture will ripple around the world hour by hour. That's a new one on me.
Mainstream Christian thinkers and scholars have already given many reasons for doubting Camping's timetable, based on the naive, relatively recent, and checkered pedigree of premillennial dispensationalism. Anybody with some historical knowledge should already be skeptical, since such definitive and dated assurances have been made many times previously and have always failed.
I grew up in a church where the Rapture was a fervent article of faith, and a near-future historical event that we all looked forward to. We saw it in films, heard about it in revivals, sang songs about it around the campfire. But I came to realize, during my university education in religious studies, that the Rapture is not a prophecy of an end-times event that can be pinpointed in the Bible, but instead is a piece of a larger theory created by assembling a complex puzzle from verses scattered all over scripture -- including verses that quite clearly were not intended by their authors or understood by their original audiences to be prophecies of the end times.
So not only am I confident the Rapture isn't happening on May 21, I'm confident the Rapture isn't happening at all, ever. Even if I were a biblical literalist, I wouldn't believe in the Rapture as it's preached and in the system in which it was invented and remains embedded -- as a removal of believers from the earth prior to the rise of the Antichrist and the time of tribulation. Because that's a combination of Paul's statement that the dead in Christ will rise first and believers will meet Christ in the air when Jesus comes again -- that is, as the sequence of events in a single happening called the second coming -- and the Revelation narrative with its seven-year periods and various Satanic figures and awful plagues. There's nothing obvious or literal about combining those two parts of Scripture, written by different people for different reasons in completely different political and religious circumstances at least fifty years apart (notably, one before the destruction of the Jerusalem temple and one after). The fact that many people regard this combination as natural and obvious is a testimony to how thoroughly this century-old system of interpretation has infiltrated parts of the evangelical world.
Wouldn't it be nice if we didn't have to deal with our long-term problems or care about the future of the world's oppressed and poor because the world was going to end? If the countdown to the new heaven and the new earth relieved us of our responsibilities to each other? I know that thoughtful Rapture believers would never advocate such a perspective. But I also know that the end of the world and Judgment Day, if asserted as actual near-future historical events, are bound to relativize the value of all our other mandates and efforts.
So I encourage everyone to pay their bills and leave their 401(k)s alone and get the oil changed in their cars. We'll all still be here May 22, and on the day after the next predicted end of the world, and basically until the world is done with us -- not when God decides to pull the plug.
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
From K-Tel!

I never thought I would juxtapose the terms "K-Tel" and "knitting," but there they are in my hand -- two sticks of light blue plastic with red collars on both ends and a needle-eye at their points. A colleague getting back into knitting and crochet brought them to me during a tutoring session today. She had inherited them along with rolls and bags of other miscellaneous tools from a great-aunt, and wondered if I knew what they were.
After a little research, I found that the little blue sticks were a 1960's example of a phenomenon that persists into the modern day -- inventions that purport to make crafting easier, combine two crafts, or create a brand new one. From cro-tatting to latch-hooking, these innovations rely on entrepreneurial promotion to lure in crafters either dissatisfied with their current options or interested in picking up a new technique. Some (like latch-hooking) stuck, and some (like K-Tel knitting) did not.
The K-Tel Knitter promised (in this commercial) to produce knit and crochet fabric in a revolutionary way. But from instructions posted by Marnie MacLean, the instrument really just mimics crochet without the hooking. Instead, the K-Tel Knitter stick pushes a loop through each stitch, where you grab it with your fingers and hold it while the Knitter is pulled out.
Looks like this gadget was made in ample quantities -- they're not hard to find on eBay, and if you have a basket of crafting tools inherited from the baby-boom generation, you might have one, too. Doubtful that it will convince any of us to give up our trusty hooks, but if it really took this baby-blue stick to make that awesome poncho in the commercial, I might be tempted.
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
Apple for the teacher
Around the time final exams were happening at my university, I startled awake late one night with a sinking thought: I hadn't figured out what to give the kids' teachers at the end of their school year. Just moments later I realized that they still had more than a month left before summer break, plenty of time for me to figure it out. I relaxed and went back to sleep.
A couple of weeks later, the question is now more pressing -- especially if I want to make something for the teachers. It's Archer's last year at this school, and I'd like to do something small for his special activity teachers, cafeteria monitor, therapist, and principal, in addition to his classroom teacher. Cady Gray's teacher is a young and stylish woman for whom I'd like to make a hip hat or scarf. I can't make those for everyone else, though, or I'll run out of time and ideas.
For Christmas, they all got crochet cup cozies with Starbucks gift cards. I'm not sure about a similarly small and quick end of year idea, though. Apple cozies are a possibility -- they're teacher-appropriate and very adorable and unusual, but I worry that they are not all that useful.
Do you have any go-to teacher gifts in your repertoire? If you were a teacher receiving a handmade gift, what would you wish for?
A couple of weeks later, the question is now more pressing -- especially if I want to make something for the teachers. It's Archer's last year at this school, and I'd like to do something small for his special activity teachers, cafeteria monitor, therapist, and principal, in addition to his classroom teacher. Cady Gray's teacher is a young and stylish woman for whom I'd like to make a hip hat or scarf. I can't make those for everyone else, though, or I'll run out of time and ideas.
For Christmas, they all got crochet cup cozies with Starbucks gift cards. I'm not sure about a similarly small and quick end of year idea, though. Apple cozies are a possibility -- they're teacher-appropriate and very adorable and unusual, but I worry that they are not all that useful.
Do you have any go-to teacher gifts in your repertoire? If you were a teacher receiving a handmade gift, what would you wish for?
Monday, May 16, 2011
On assignment
One of the categories I'm supposed to list for my year-end faculty activity report is "community service for which your professional training is essential." The idea is to show what you do outside of your job that enriches the lives of others through the kind of expertise you bring to the inside of your job.
I always think about that phrase "for which your professional training is essential" when I'm asked to contribute a piece to an online magazine or speak to a Sunday school class. Those invitations come with a fair amount of regularity, probably due to a combination of the expertise I have to contribute and the avocations and extracurricular interests for which I'm known.
Consider the latest few examples -- two pieces for the recently-launched site Jesus, Jazz, Buddhism and one that will be appearing at the end of the week on Arkansas: Abroad. The topics I was asked to cover were movies (The King's Speech in particular), the internet (and its relation to a philosophy of the material world in particular), and religious tolerance (stemming from a visit by the Dalai Lama to the area), all from the perspective of a theologian. That list extends to the sites of my research interests, draws upon non-theological expertise I've developed, and stakes a position in an area where anyone in my field would be expected to be able to speak cogently.
I like being asked to write these pieces, although they're not always easy. It seems to me that academics ought to contribute to the public conversation in areas where our training has led us to think deeply. The most rewarding part, though, is being able to make connections between the skills I've developed in various aspects of my work and the kinds of cultural conversations in which a broad array of people want to be involved.
I always think about that phrase "for which your professional training is essential" when I'm asked to contribute a piece to an online magazine or speak to a Sunday school class. Those invitations come with a fair amount of regularity, probably due to a combination of the expertise I have to contribute and the avocations and extracurricular interests for which I'm known.
Consider the latest few examples -- two pieces for the recently-launched site Jesus, Jazz, Buddhism and one that will be appearing at the end of the week on Arkansas: Abroad. The topics I was asked to cover were movies (The King's Speech in particular), the internet (and its relation to a philosophy of the material world in particular), and religious tolerance (stemming from a visit by the Dalai Lama to the area), all from the perspective of a theologian. That list extends to the sites of my research interests, draws upon non-theological expertise I've developed, and stakes a position in an area where anyone in my field would be expected to be able to speak cogently.
I like being asked to write these pieces, although they're not always easy. It seems to me that academics ought to contribute to the public conversation in areas where our training has led us to think deeply. The most rewarding part, though, is being able to make connections between the skills I've developed in various aspects of my work and the kinds of cultural conversations in which a broad array of people want to be involved.
Sunday, May 15, 2011
Weepies
Noel and I are going out for a rare dinner-and-a-movie tonight, which will be followed when we get home by late Survivor finale and school lunch packing. So I'll very quickly note that both of us spent part of the day wiping tears from our eyes -- me because of this story about an unlikely long-distance connection forged by a tornado disaster, from the Washington Post (reprinted in our local paper), and Noel because of the documentary Louder Than A Bomb, which caught him off guard with its portrait of a high school experience rarely caught on film these days, but whose kids in solidarity through a shared activity and talent was quite familiar to him. What have you read or seen recently that has similarly moved you?
Saturday, May 14, 2011
And the rain comes down in the midst of spring
Today's post about the perfect Mother's Day gift -- time to sew -- is at Toxophily.

During the most hectic days of the last two months, it felt like I might never get back to making things with cloth and thread and string and hooks and needles again. Mother's Day and the arrival of summer marks a return to creating. I hope it lasts the whole summer through.

During the most hectic days of the last two months, it felt like I might never get back to making things with cloth and thread and string and hooks and needles again. Mother's Day and the arrival of summer marks a return to creating. I hope it lasts the whole summer through.
Friday, May 13, 2011
Quick hits
Reposting my old blog site on Tumblr has made me realize that I used to do a lot more short or bullet-point-style entries. These days I feel like I'm not really writing unless I'm writing a multi-paragraph essay. It's nice to give myself permission to just touch on a few brief topics instead.
- At Cady Gray's recital last night, both my kids were delighted -- delighted! -- that an older student performed a song from Super Mario World, the "Air Platform" theme. I wouldn't have recognized the music from the rather abstract beginning, but once it segued into a rollicking ragtime beat, I caught some familiar notes. We ended up humming it all the way home.
- What's the difference between a subscription and an automatic home delivery service? I guess a subscription implies some discount off the cover price of a magazine -- that's all I can figure. Interweave Press publishes a magazine called Knitscene that has been coming out about twice or three times a year on an irregular schedule, and people who like the magazine have been asking about subscriptions for years. No subscription, but there's a "consumer auto-ship program" you can sign up for (a fee of $0.99 applies, then your credit card is charged each time a new issue is released and it's mailed to you for free). As one of those Knitscene fans who has to go looking at the local bookstore every time I know a new one has come out, I'm signing up, but I still don't understand why we can't just subscribe to it and be done.
- Come later this summer, the Craft Wisely class blog will start coming to life as students enrolled in the class for the fall 2011 semester begin posting about their summer crafting and learning. If you haven't followed that blog or subscribed to the feed in your favorite reader, take a second and do it now, won't you?
One keyboard, four hands
A lengthy Blogger outage kept me from posting last night, but here's what I was going to offer: Video documentation of our kids' piano recitals. They both did fantastic and are eager to continue learning. Best of all: post-recital treats!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)


